YH
Posts:252
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 04:47 AM |
�
|
|
|
| The REAL truth of the matter is- most people don't want the truth. They want what they want to hear. |
|
|
swnoel
Posts:620
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 05:03 AM |
�
|
There's way too many people on the Earth... maybe more genocide could correct the horror of man made global warming.
YH... who do you think should be killed first... well besides the unborn child and all Republicans presently suggested.
|
|
| "The BIG Lie"
The phrase was also used in a report prepared during the war by the United States Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler's psychological profile:[5][6]
His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.[7]
|
|
|
yote
Posts:743
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 06:50 AM |
�
|
global warming is bs. but even if it does warm up 1o degrees in the next century the world will not end , the sky is not falling.politicians just try to keep the masses in a state of panic. they are much easier to controll that way.and even if it warms up enough to make mankind extinct ,who gives a chit?we will all be dead by then anyhow and those left behind will just have to do what species on earth have been doing for millenia, adapt or don't |
|
| so goes the church, so goes the nation |
|
|
copperhead70
Posts:139
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 07:27 AM |
�
|
Al Gore sued by over 30.000 Scientists for Global Warming fraud / John Coleman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfHW7KR33IQ
Sell your bs to someone else yh! |
|
| The untutored person with passion
is more persuasive than the most eloquent without.
|
|
|
Uncle Johnny
Posts:110
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 08:11 AM |
�
|
Again, the fact that they are trying to sell "the debate is settled", "the case is closed", etc. regarding man-made global warming is enough of a red flag to me. As long as there are a great number of scientists who are still questioning this, the debate is not settled. And factor in what is being done to "combat" it (selling carbon credits, etc.), it just adds so much to my skepticism.
Also, I've heard that the 'climate models' that supposedly predict the future doom and gloom cannot accurately predict the past.
|
|
| "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." --James Madison
|
|
|
SteelCandy
Posts:236
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 09:35 AM |
�
|
CNN, recently caught airing false reports for hire - ie foreign governments and ours as well paid cnn to run FAKE stories. And now for the CO2 "greenhouse" effect numbers ... this requires math and facts so it might be tough for libs to understand... All "greenhouse" gases = 2% of atmosphere 3.62% of "greenhouse" gases = CO2 3.4% of CO2 = human caused .02x.0362x.034 = 0.000024616 0.000024616 x 100 = 0.0024616 % of the atmosphere = man made CO2 More facts Higher CO2 levels enable plants to grow bigger and produce more edible products, increasing our food supply. Without CO2, plants will die and the entire human civilization along with them. 440 million years ago CO2 levels = 10x present levels, Earth temps = COLDEST in the last 500 MILLION years 1940 - 1075 significant cooling occured even as CO2 levels produced by mankind increased rapidly. Over the last 500,000 or so years we can measure temps vs CO2 levels, CO2 levels rose 800 YEARS AFTER the temp increase not before. Since 2000 at the latest, Kyoto treaty was proposed as the world's 1st "global governance" and as a way for the UN to take control of ALL nations. 89% of the official ground weather stations FAILED NASA's siting requirements. Temp recordings taken next to heat producing items or above asphalt parking lots which naturally have higher temp readings than the rest of the area. John Coleman, founder of The Weather Channel " Global warming is the greatest scam in history" Please discuss facts, not political lies used to further a socialist agenda. Pollution is bad but more damage will occur as a result of bad policy.
|
|
|
|
|
holly
Posts:2245
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 11:42 AM |
�
|
It is all liberal fraud ,and they keep putting it out there to support their way of just getting more money out of the peoples pockets .You know like carbon taxes .When are they going to put monitors on your rump to see how much methane comes out when you fart and then tax you on it .And then what are they going to do with all the methane that comes out of sewage plants .Some use it to cook the chit in the digestor's at the plants .Oh yes that brings up another .Was it not the same kind that said we should reduce the number of cows because of the same problem .Yea fart gas . |
|
|
|
|
flatbkman
Posts:153
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 11:48 AM |
�
|
Yet these same people tell us in order to be green, we need to mulch our grabage and lawn and grass clippings which creates even more of the gasses that they say we need to eliminate. |
|
|
|
|
ahoffman2
Posts:184
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 12:31 PM |
�
|
Durn Yukon, I woulda thot that you, more then any of the rest of us,would be glad that we have been haveing a warming trend for the last Million years or so. After all, weren't to many years ago, that your part of this planet was covered with a layer of ice 2 mi. thick! Scientist have now decided that our original man, the Clovas man, didn't come across the Bering, but followed the ice, from the area of now France, to our east coast, to settle in the mid east coast. At that time, they figured the ice was close to a mile deep over the NE U.S. Yaaa, I would think that folks would be glad that we have been getting warmer in the last million years or so. Allen |
|
|
|
|
copperhead70
Posts:139
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 03:10 PM |
�
|
Posted By holly on 08 Mar 2013 12:42 PM
(how much methane comes out when you fart) and then tax you on it .And then what are they going to do with all the methane that comes out of sewage plants .Some use it to cook the chit in the digestor's at the plants .Oh yes that brings up another .Was it not the same kind that said we should reduce the number of cows because of the same problem .Yea fart gas .
http://www.gowally.com/fun/farts.htm
#3- How much gas does a normal person pass per day?
On average, a person produces about half a liter of fart gas per day, distributed over an average of about fourteen daily farts. Whereas it may be difficult for you to determine your daily flatus volume, you can certainly keep track of your daily numerical fart count. You might try this as a science fair project: Keep a journal of everything you eat and a count of your farts. You might make a note of the potency of their odor as well. See if you can discover a relationship between what you eat, how much you fart, and how much they smell.
|
|
| The untutored person with passion
is more persuasive than the most eloquent without.
|
|
|
Lunkerdog
Posts:928
 |
| 08 Mar 2013 05:36 PM |
�
|
Posted By holly on 08 Mar 2013 12:42 PM
It is all liberal fraud ,and they keep putting it out there to support their way of just getting more money out of the peoples pockets .You know like carbon taxes .When are they going to put monitors on your rump to see how much methane comes out when you fart and then tax you on it .And then what are they going to do with all the methane that comes out of sewage plants .Some use it to cook the chit in the digestor's at the plants .Oh yes that brings up another .Was it not the same kind that said we should reduce the number of cows because of the same problem .Yea fart gas .
It's not from a lack of effort that they're not taxing farts 
Hell... They actually did it here!!!
|
|
 |
|
|
SGINGRAS
Posts:998
 |
|
YH
Posts:252
 |
| 09 Mar 2013 06:50 AM |
�
|
As per normal, the crew of intellects on here CLEARLY knows better than the 98% of climate researchers. After all- why wouldn't y'all have a much better grip on this than people who actually have some knowledge of the subject at hand?
BTW, sw- it seemed rather odd that 30, 000 scientists, led by ohn Coleman (who, btw, is a weatherman- not a scientist) were suing Al Gore, and I hadn't been reading about it steady. Maybe this is why...
"This is a myth that has been going round for a couple of years now. It originated from a video made by John Coleman in which Coleman said he was going to take Al Gore to court over his malicious global warming claims. In the same video Coleman made reference to 30,000 scientists who had signed a petition against global warming. There was never any mention of the scientists suing Gore. Coleman has yet to initiate his action against Gore and the ’30,000 scientists’ claim is another myth. This relates to a document known as the Oregon Petition. It originated in 1998 from Professor Frederick Seitz and circulated under the guise of having come from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS).
Seitz sent out a mailing card together with a covering letter and invited people who had a degree qualification to sign and return the card. The petition was for the US Government not to sign up to the Kyoto Protocol, there was no mention of either global warming or of climate change.
Thinking the petition had come from the NAS a number of cards were signed and returned. Upon collecting the signatures the wording of the petition was changed.
Because signatures were collected by means of a mailshot there was no verification process in place and as a consequence the signatories included Donald Duck, Mickey Mouse, John Lennon, Elvis Presley and various incarnations of the Spice Girls.
A few years ago some 13,000 names were removed from the petition. Of the remaining 18,000 names there are many from people who have no scientific credentials. Recently it appears that many of these names were mysteriously reinstated. I have consulted the petition on several occasions and to date have found only one person who is a climate scientist and that is Russell Qualls, it appears his name is a fraudulent addition as he believes in manmade global warming.
Whilst the Oregon Petition is blatantly fraudulent there is a less fraudulent petition that scientists can sign ‘against’ global warming. This is known as the Leipzig Declaration, it has been available since 1995 and attracts about one signature a month from the 60 million who are eligible to sign it.
However, an investigation by a Danish journalist found that many of the names on the declaration were invalid and the true number of genuine signatories appears to be in the order of 30 to 50 people."
It continues to bewilder me that some of you seemingly intelligent people are incapable of doing any actual research into the veracity of statements that are being fed to you on critical issues. One word...... sheeple. |
|
| The REAL truth of the matter is- most people don't want the truth. They want what they want to hear. |
|
|
rthomas4
Posts:2343
 |
| 09 Mar 2013 06:59 AM |
�
|
YH, that's 98% of climate researchers who are paid to be proponents of global warming. There is also about 98% of paid scientists who are on the other side of the debate. The question then becomes just which side of the debate's group of scientist actually have it right?????? I tend to go along with the 98% who aren't affiliated with any of the liberal organizations or causes. |
|
| NRA LM, NAHC LM, Buckmasters LM, Second Amendment Foundation, GOA, NAGR, Palmetto Gun Rights, DU, NWTF, QDMA, Everyday Hunter,OYOA, ASAdspalliance,D& DH, and PROUD SC redneck REBEL for life. If the South had won the war, Obama wouldn't be in the White House. |
|
|
YH
Posts:252
 |
| 09 Mar 2013 07:10 AM |
�
|
RT- It isn't 98% of those paid to be proponents... it's 98%. Period. Besides, I'd be more inclined to agree with the NAS than with Exxon's CEO on this subject. Oh... wait a minute.... even HE admits than it's a reality.... |
|
| The REAL truth of the matter is- most people don't want the truth. They want what they want to hear. |
|
|
rthomas4
Posts:2343
 |
| 09 Mar 2013 07:15 AM |
�
|
YH, according to WHO? Let's face it the liberals control the media, they control the statistics that get printed and broadcast, and in turn, they are controlled by the UN. And, do you mean to tell me that YOU of all people accept the opinion of Exxon's CEO? You only accept positions from those type of people, when it suits your personal opinion; which certainly doesn't validate their beliefs for everyone. |
|
| NRA LM, NAHC LM, Buckmasters LM, Second Amendment Foundation, GOA, NAGR, Palmetto Gun Rights, DU, NWTF, QDMA, Everyday Hunter,OYOA, ASAdspalliance,D& DH, and PROUD SC redneck REBEL for life. If the South had won the war, Obama wouldn't be in the White House. |
|
|
YH
Posts:252
 |
| 09 Mar 2013 07:33 AM |
�
|
Holy chit. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. How does one argue with people who would rather stick their heads in the sand? "Well, sure, you can present facts, but if they don't suit my argument, then it must be because of the liberal media...". Go do research- and I'm not talking about CNN or Faux "News"- I'm talking about peer-reviewable, unaffiliated sites. Stop being so close-minded, and open yourself up to the possibility that maybe... just MAYBE the whole global warming thing isn't some covert plan to subjugate the U.S. Maybe it's actually happening. |
|
| The REAL truth of the matter is- most people don't want the truth. They want what they want to hear. |
|
|
copperhead70
Posts:139
 |
| 09 Mar 2013 07:46 AM |
�
|
Maybe it's actually happening.
THE SKY IF FALLING..... THE SKY IS FALLING  |
|
| The untutored person with passion
is more persuasive than the most eloquent without.
|
|
|
ckell
Posts:793
 |
| 09 Mar 2013 10:15 AM |
�
|
There is no daught humans are have some impact on the global enviorment, to what extent is the debate. How much is the natural cycle of the earth and how much is human. Peoiods of Sun spots, solar flares, volcanos, the two El twins. There are those who believe the poles will reverse, there is evidence it has happened before but how oftin. Yellow could erupt, it has happen before, asteroid could hit, that has happen before, Another ice age. We all run around saying the sky is falling. yh believes gun control will stop it, we believe gun control will start it. The earth has been turning for million of years, before humans it has under gone many changes and will continue with or without us. We know one thing, once somthing happens and those who are left they are going to have to defend themselves, if any people are left, good and evil will remain in some from or another. |
|
| The 1st Amendment insures our Right to speak out when it or our other Rights are Transgressed. The 2nd insures the 1st. Native Texan |
|
|
bigrig
Posts:325
 |
| 09 Mar 2013 12:13 PM |
�
|
YH: You sure your not from the Yukon and your names not Cam? Yukon Hunter used to play devils advocate and take the other side of a lot of debates on these boards. You sure remind me a lot of him. |
|
|
|
|