Hunting Forum

Sorry LD wrong thread, I was being ask questions while reading and posting, posted to the wrong thread.

Posted By ckell on 23 Feb 2013 02:15 PM
We all know the liberal Democrats want gun bans. We know the real reason behind F&F. Even though that little feasco fail, they are still working on it. The Mexican Government calling for tighter gun control in the US, they are still trying even though Everybody knows. F&F never gained the traction it was designed to do. But low and behold Sandy Hook happened.

Posted By abranch on 23 Feb 2013 03:56 PM
Oops, I found out that I am below a below average person, I don't drink enough beer.

Posted By ckell on 23 Feb 2013 11:20 PM
I do drink beer, but I have a taste for the whiskeys and scotch, resently discovered some very good moonshine mixes with hoof water very well. Not sur how to calculate that into beers. Guess I have converted to ETOH of a higher grade than beer, got to be green you know.

Posted By rthomas4 on 24 Feb 2013 07:59 AM
The statistics are way off! I know damn good and well I personally consumed way more than 22 gallons of beer, my freshman year in college, back in 1971. Then when I consider that over the four years total spent in college, and all of the golf I played, where a minimum of two cases per 18 holes was consumed up until I reached the age of about 39, that has to be many times above the 22 gallon average, and well above the mileage category. For the last 15 or so years, my consumption of beer averages less than 1 per year, since I only consume one when I have a kidney stone, and I do not drink any other alcoholic beverages at all; my walking mileage also being decreased over the same time period, makes my younger days far outnumber the average and my later days fall far behind the averages! Therefore, in my case, the statistics are grossly incorrect!!!!!!!!