Hunting Forum

Is Anyone Else Writing Their State and Federal Representatives?
Last Post 25 Feb 2013 01:48 PM by rice201. 25 Replies.
AddThis - Bookmarking and Sharing Button Printer Friendly
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>
Author Messages
ElkaholicUser is Offline

Elkaholic Send Private Message Posts:87
--
04 Feb 2013 07:56 PM

Hey Gang,

Things are really escalating on gun control initiatives.

We all need to do everything in our collective power to stop this potential gun grabbing.
Besides joining, renewing current membership, or donating to groups like the NRA, GOA, or NAGR in order to help them fight for us, we need to do what we can on our own.

One of the easiest ways we can do so is to write our representatives in the U.S. House and Senate, as well as our state legislators.
It only takes a few minutes to write a letter and send the same one to each of them.  Direct contact from their constituents speaks volumes.

Those I have daily email contact with are probably sick of my being a pain in the butt and reminding them how important this is.  However, if my persistence results in just one more letter written it'll be worth it.

If any of you are interested in doing so and don't know how to reach them, please PM me or email me at elkaholic@centurytel.net and I'll help you out.  Several friends have already taken me up on the offer.  I've sent them links to their representatives' sites, and all they had to concentrate on was writing their letters.
We have six important representatives to contact - three in the U.S. Congress and three in our state legislature.  After all, that's what copying and pasting is for...

If any of you are even remotely considering it, there's no time like the present. According to the reply I received from Maria Cantwell, they'll be debating Diane Feinstein's extreme gun control bill soon.

The amazing thing to me is that those calling for strict gun control have no idea how much damage they're doing to their own way of life by doing so. 

Thanks for your time,
Steve

josborne28User is Offline

josborne28 Send Private Message Posts:68
--
05 Feb 2013 10:13 AM
NRA Light member and been sending letters myself. Im in the fight with you brother. Did you see the reaction of those in New York when they introduced the law for citizens to turn in their "Assault Rifles" and magazines. Cant believe whats happening these days.

P.S. I raised my glass to an American Hero - Chris Kyle last night. R.I.P.
All-DayUser is Offline

All-Day Send Private Message Posts:45
--
05 Feb 2013 10:52 AM

I have contacted all of them. Even though the info seems to fall on deaf ears, I still keep putting them out. We solicit all the members in the WWA and other groups to contact their Reps. I think the unbelieveable rise in permit apps and instant checks will say more than anything. The anti gun senators just keep getting voted in so more letters MUST go out. Jesse jackson put out that chicago needs more "homeland security patrols" to curb gun violence. I cannot believe that anyone still listens to that creep.

Keep writing folks, but don't stop there. Get everyone you know to send them out. A family of four should be putting out four letters. Age and residence does not matter! Don't forget all the social media that can be used for commenting.

Thanks to all that have gotten involved. You are not wasting your time!

Kurt

ElkaholicUser is Offline

Elkaholic Send Private Message Posts:87
--
05 Feb 2013 08:27 PM

Thanks, guys.  Nice to see others doing what they can for the cause.

I've received replies from Senator Cantwell and Representative Kilmer (my rep. in the House).  They both spoke of Obama's "balanced" approach, but never told me how they felt about gun control.
The funny part is that Obama talks about 5% on mental health and the media, and 95% on gun grabbing.  Not very balanced if you ask me.

I talk to tons of people who gripe about it, but won't take the time to write or donate to a gun rights organization to help them fight for us.  When I talked to one close friend about writing her representatives today, she told me "ain't gonna happen - it won't do any good, anyway".

My reply to her was "it certainly can't hurt" and then some.

Keep up the good work, guys.  And I hope the others here follow suit.
Friends have asked me to share my letters with them to give them ideas & starting points with theirs.  I happily shared them, and will do so with anyone here if they're interested.

And ditto to what Kurt said - we are not wasting our time.  If they're going to try pushing an agenda like this on us, then we all need to push back even harder.

Thanks again,
Steve

All-DayUser is Offline

All-Day Send Private Message Posts:45
--
06 Feb 2013 10:28 AM

I usually say in my letter "no need to reply". The whole idea is to not let them forget that we are here and can be formitable. In your letters be polite. Stay on one subject and feel free to give an opinion. Your Reps are not going to read it unless it is special. I always strive to make the letter special without being accusing and negative. DON"T sound threatening! Your letter will represent many depending on how many write in your district. Please don't hammer me for this but you must sound politically correct but also sound like your subject is from the heart. Spelling does NOT count but spell check will help a lot. If you have more than one subject to write about do it in separate letters. Depending on who I'm writing to I will ask to be a part of the solution and to be put on any notice list for meetings and such. Childrens letters are a good example and are almost always read by the recipiant as they are true to the subject and direct! I will dig up a few of my letters and post them today after my chores are done.

Thank You

Kurt

ElkaholicUser is Offline

Elkaholic Send Private Message Posts:87
--
06 Feb 2013 07:16 PM

All great points, Kurt.  I strive to stay within the same guidelines, myself.

I also resist the temptation to take jabs at those or their parties who I don't support (which is just about everyone here in WA state and the Obama administration).
Even though you couldn't pay me enough to vote for my current representatives, alienating them by taking those all too tempting subtle shots would just result in them blowing me off.  Then my letter would totally be for naught.

And while often painful to do, I usually thank them for their service as my representative. 

All-DayUser is Offline

All-Day Send Private Message Posts:45
--
14 Feb 2013 02:28 PM

Please write the Senate Law and Justice Committee, and your state Senator asking them to oppose SB5737 – AN ACT Relating to Banning the Sale of Assault Weapons. I have provided a fast and easy copy and paste message for you to use, or you can compose your own. The important action is that you write. Please urge your family, friends, and colleagues to do the same.
   

This is important if you enjoy your freedoms!
 

Find your legislator:

http://app.leg.wa.gov/DistrictFinder/"> http://app.leg.wa.gov/DistrictFinder/

You can also find your Representatives and write them using the NRA-ILA write-your-reps tool:

http://www.nraila.org/get-involved-locally/grassroots/write-your-reps.aspx

Link to SB5737 Bill Summary:

http://dlr.leg.wa.gov/billsummary/default.aspx?Bill=5737&year=2013

Link to original Bill:

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2013-14/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Bills/5737.pdf

Copy and paste email addresses of Senate Law and Justice Committee members:

mike.padden@leg.wa.gov ; michael.carrell@leg.wa.gov; adam.kline@leg.wa.gov; j.darneille@leg.wa.gov; jeanne.kohl-welles@leg.wa.gov; kirk.pearson@leg.wa.gov; pam.roach@leg.wa.gov

Copy and paste subject:

Oppose SB5737 – AN ACT Relating to Banning the Sale of Assault Weapons

Copy and paste message:

Dear Senate Law and Justice Committee:

I am writing today to ask that you oppose SB5737 – AN ACT Relating to banning the sale of assault weapons. This bill demonizes cosmetic and common firearm features of some guns that have nothing to with actual “assault” weapons. The term “Assault Weapon” is propaganda perpetuated by anti-gun factions in the media, anti-gun organizations, and anti-gun Representatives. Former Speaker Newt Gingrich summed it up very well on CBS’s Face the Nation: “Any true military weapon is illegal, has been illegal since 1934. Somebody’s using an AK-47, they are using an illegal weapon because it is an automatic weapon. We do not allow people to buy automatic weapons unless they have a very strict collector’s license.” Please stop allowing this propaganda to continue and actually be considered being made into law.

It has become very obvious that there are many anti-gun Representatives and others that are taking advantage of the irrational and emotional tidal wave that resulted from the tragedy in Connecticut. None of the recently proposed gun-related legislation, including SB5737, addresses the root causes of the type of tragedy that occurred in Connecticut. This nation has cultural, metal health, gang, organized crime, and drug issues that contribute far more to outbreaks of violence. In my opinion, our Representatives should be focusing on these issues, not burdening law-abiding citizens with more unneeded regulations that serve only to satisfy anti-gun agendas.

It saddens my heart that so many of our Representatives are so willing to trash the rights and freedoms guaranteed to us by the Constitution and Bill of Rights; the oath of office they took obviously meant nothing to them.

Please put a stop to these unprecedented attacks on guns and law-abiding gun owners which do nothing to curb violence or prevent criminals from carrying out their malevolent deeds. Imposing a barrage of useless gun-control regulations and laws onto law-abiding citizens will do nothing but whittle away at our liberty, rights, and freedoms we have fought so hard to obtain and keep.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

[Your contact information]

ElkaholicUser is Offline

Elkaholic Send Private Message Posts:87
--
14 Feb 2013 07:34 PM

Thanks for the heads up, Kurt.  I'll draft up a letter and send it out to my representatives tonight.

I'll be putting the word out to every gun owner/potential gun owner I know here in WA, and will ask them to do the same with everyone they know.
I'll also post it on several firearms forums I'm registered on.

Listening to the John Carlson show this morning, I heard the tail end of what I believe to be an interview with someone who attended a meeting on some sort of proposed gun control here in WA state.  This must've been what it was on.
While he said he didn't believe this had a chance of passing, we all need to do our part to ensure it doesn't.

By the way, you're 100% right on this.  I hope the rest of you are on-board and will do whatever you can to help stop this madness.

Steve

All-DayUser is Offline

All-Day Send Private Message Posts:45
--
14 Feb 2013 08:33 PM

Here is a reply from Senator Pam Roach on the Wa State bills in the J.C.



 

Hi Mike
Thanks for writing about SB 5737, introduced yesterday. I appreciate your prompt diligence for contacting me about this bill.
The only good thing about SB 5737 is that it has no chance to become law. This bill has been referred to the Senate Law & Justice Committee on which I serve. The majority makeup of that committee and the disposition of the chair, I expect this bill will remain bottled up in committee and die quietly, same as other gun control measures that must pass this committee.
By the same token, any House bills on gun control that pass out of the House would proceed to the Senate and be heard in Law & Justice. I would expect them to be dead on arrival.
MORE ACTION>>> But I do recommend that you contact the office of Senator Mike Padden, chair of the Law and Justice Committee to echo your remarks. Chairman Padden directs which bills are heard in his committee and which do not get a hearing - thus rendering them dead. Email: mike.padden@leg.wa.gov, office phone: (360) 786-7606. Sen. Padden is probably the single most influential person in this legislature for stopping any gun control measures.
You can always count on my support to oppose any measures that would limit the 2nd Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens – every single time!
Thank you for your outreach.
cid:image002.jpg@01CDFA23.5516A840
Pam Roach
State Senator
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_2_2ca95cc0-4c68-4621-baf5-9bd5359e2795 -->
ElkaholicUser is Offline

Elkaholic Send Private Message Posts:87
--
14 Feb 2013 09:17 PM

Well, that's encouraging.  While this one may go nowhere, we still need to keep the pressure on and make our voices heard in every way we can.
It may just prevent future legislation from being proposed, and it'll help to stay one step ahead of it.

rice201User is Offline

rice201 Send Private Message Posts:13
--
15 Feb 2013 08:40 AM
I just finished writing to my senator and reps about 5737. The wording in that bill is scary! It actually called out yearly home inspections by the local sheriff.
I wrote to our state reps last month, still haven't heard anything from Murray or Larsen. But even after Feinstein Cantwell is still sending out the same canned mail about how great the presidents proposals were.
josborne28User is Offline

josborne28 Send Private Message Posts:68
--
15 Feb 2013 11:10 AM
I just read this and i need to re-read it when i have more time. Class C felons. Really. in home inspections! Absurd. Letters being sent now. Whats next?

(c) For a class C felony, by confinement in a state correctional institution for five years, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of ten thousand dollars, or by both such confinement and fine.

(2) Gross misdemeanor. Every person convicted of a gross misdemeanor defined in Title 9A RCW shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a maximum term fixed by the court of up to three hundred sixty-four days, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not more than five thousand dollars, or by both such imprisonment and fine.
ElkaholicUser is Offline

Elkaholic Send Private Message Posts:87
--
16 Feb 2013 10:55 AM

Yeah, the annual inspections really stood out to me too.  I definitely had to re-read that one to be sure of what it said.

In my correspondence to my reps, one of the things I covered was how many otherwise upstanding and law abiding citizens will refuse to limit their ability to defend themselves and ignore these laws.  In the case of limiting the number of rounds in a chamber like the NY bill, these people could serve prison time for having one extra round in  the chamber.
Is this something these gun grabbing politicians want on their hands?  And no, I don't word it that way... 

I've also told them that having the gov't start disarming us will be seen by many as an attempt to render us defenseless against said government.  And this would result in dissention within this country the likes of which have never been seen in our lifetimes.  I honestly don't think they realize the scope and consequences of what they're attempting to do here.

I'm finding out that many people who share our feelings don't feel comfortable drafting letters and don't know where to start, as Kurt eluded to by posting his examples.  For those of us who are comfortable doing it, we need to help the others if possible.
I have a close older friend who admitted in an email that she doesn't write well, and doesn't want to embarrass herself with something not well written.  We agreed that I'll draft a letter(s) for her, and after she approves them I'll help her send them to the appropriate people.  They'll just have to be a different format than mine in order to be genuine.

Yes, it's work (I can certainly think of more fun things to do on a three day weekend).  But it's work that we all need to do if we can, as we're all in  this together.  I certainly plan to take my destiny into my own hands and go down swinging.

Anyway, for those of you planning to attend our GT in June, this will obviously be a topic for us to chew on around the campfire.  It'll be interesting to see what's transpired between now and then.  Hopefully, with our efforts - little to nothing.


 

All-DayUser is Offline

All-Day Send Private Message Posts:45
--
16 Feb 2013 02:10 PM

Here is another example you can glean from. This is an actual letter (from a Wa resident) that really stands out.

Thanks for the support on this folks. We all know these bills are politically motivated and are just pure crap. I WORRIES me that so many so-called Americans voted these socialists in. I have an educational video that will sum it all up and will post it as soon as I find it in the maze of files I've accumulated.
Kurt


 


 
Dear Rep. (    )   : I am a senior citizen who lives in your district and I voted for you in the last election. I consider myself to be a relatively informed
voter. I am writing to you in support of our Second Amendment Rights under the US Constitution. Please, please, please do not destroy our gun rights
in the State of Washington. Something that the Democrats are adamantly trying to do.
I am writing you specifically inopposition to both HB 1588 and HB 1676 that are due to be voted on next Wednesday February 19th, 2013. I vigorously
encourage you to vote against both of these bills. They are practically unenforceable, they would place a huge manpower and financial burden on our
already overworked police departments, they conflict with Federal laws, and they would be totally ignored by all criminals and the mentally unstable,
just like all gun control laws that are enacted.
These two bills are totally reactionary and are an attempt to abide with the National Democrat platform. They are politically motivated. You know
as well I know, that 99% of all gun owners are law abiding citizens and do not harm anyone with their guns. Please do not penalize only us law-
abiding citizens by voting for these two bills.
I ask that your focus should be on these three areas related to any gun control legislation being considered in the State of Washington now and in the
future:
1.) Be a strong supporter of the US Constitution,
2.) Be a strong defender of the Second Amendment, and
3.) Be an adamant supporter of voting against any and all attempts at legislation that will ask for registration of our firearms!
I would, however, support any legislation related to keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill and mentally unstable. In addition, I would
support any legislation that would add additional penalty to any criminal using a gun in the commission of a crime, especially if that same criminal
had a record of using a gun in a crime more than once - possibly similar to "three strikes and you're out". A repeat offender should have to do
a mandatory sentence of at least 20 years, so that so-called "soft judges" could not let repeat offenders off with just a slap on the back of his hand!
Sincerely yours,
All-DayUser is Offline

All-Day Send Private Message Posts:45
--
17 Feb 2013 07:07 AM

Our American form of government. A MUST see video that may change the way you see our GREAT Country!!



http://www.wimp.com/thegovernment/

josborne28User is Offline

josborne28 Send Private Message Posts:68
--
18 Feb 2013 09:27 AM
In my letter I also referenced a few other laws and the state constitution
SECTION 2. SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land. naming the U.S.
Also the state constitution SECTION 3. PERSONAL RIGHTS - No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. (here is where I stated that legislation is not due process, if they want to take away my rights... we can go to court). I went on, and on, on but here is another section.
SECTION 7 INVASION OF PRIVATE AFFAIRS OR HOME PROHIBITED. No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.
SECTION 16 EMINENT DOMAIN - (para-phrased) No private property shall be taken or damaged for public or private use without just compensation having been first made
SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men

Eminent domain may be some what of a stretch but its still my private property. You want what I have? better fairly compensate me for it.

I also told them that the home inspections break my 4th Amendment right - "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Ultimately, these words endeavor to protect two fundamental liberty interests - the right to privacy and freedom from arbitrary invasions.

I tried to use the facts of the laws to show my argument against this bill. If this thing passes I know I wont stand alone with my rifle on my shoulder with my other "assault weapon" on my hip since it holds 16 rounds.
ElkaholicUser is Offline

Elkaholic Send Private Message Posts:87
--
18 Feb 2013 11:14 AM

Great points all.

The important thing is for us all to get involved and fight this fight together.  I don't know if they realize what they're taking on here, as this will likely create more turmoil than anything we've seen politically in our lifetimes.

I ran into a really nice couple at Wholesale Sports in Lacey on Saturday night (I was killing time there before meeting friends for dinner).  They're really involved in keeping up with the latest state and federal firearms legislation proposals, and keep constant contact with any and all of their respective representatives. 

I spoke mostly with her, and she said she posts updates regularly on Facebook.
While I'm registered there, I don't have much use for it and log in on rare occasion - mostly to accept friend requests.  I gave her my email address and once I hear from her we'll keep in contact.  She should be a good source of information.

She wrote down two proposed bills I hadn't heard of - HB1588 & SB5739.  I haven't looked into them yet, but these are likely others we need to write letters on.
While our tasks just keep growing, we need to be persistent.

FYI - I started a thread on the N.Y. forum to show them a little out-of-state support for what they're dealing with.  If you guys have a few minutes, you might want to chime in there.

Steve

rice201User is Offline

rice201 Send Private Message Posts:13
--
18 Feb 2013 11:34 AM
5739 was submitted by the same trio that submitted 5737 (Murray and co) which would add our state parks to the no-gun zones by classifing them the same way that court buildings are.
1588 is a bill to require all gun sales to go through a background check even for private sales. This one has a lot of bi-partisan support.

What's sad is the Seattle Times article (http://seattletimes.com/html/localn...7xml.html) that calls out the problems with 5737, and the sponsors even say it probably wouldn't be legal and that they didn't read it. Murray even blames a 'unnamed' staffer. Even though they submitted this exact same bill in 2010 (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/bi.../6396.pdf)

I never knew this before, and never cared unfortunatly, but it's become so hardlined I've started paying attention to all of the current bills that have been submitted. You can even view them by topic (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billsbytopic...ear=2013). This includes submitting my support to my reps on bill on HB 1191 and SB 5187 allowing ranchers to take wildlife that is endangering the livestock -- with the grey's specifically called out.
rice201User is Offline

rice201 Send Private Message Posts:13
--
18 Feb 2013 02:28 PM
Keep track of what the feedback from your representitives are now. As of this morning the wording for the home inspections have been removed from HS5737. That line now reads "(a) Safely and securely store the assault weapon;" instead of verification by the local sheriff no more than once per year.
But all the language that will classify your 9mm pistol with an extended 13 round clip, a bolt-action rifile with a thumb-hold stock, or your favorite pump action shotgun with a muzzle break as an 'assult weapon' is still alive and well.
ElkaholicUser is Offline

Elkaholic Send Private Message Posts:87
--
18 Feb 2013 04:47 PM

A member from Tennessee I've known on this board for years sent me a link to a Seattle Times article about SB5737.
http://seattletimes.com/html/localn...7xml.htmlv

It appears that lack of support for this bill may not be because of our representatives' support on gun rights, but because they know it's going too far with the home inspection clause.
All the more reason to keep hammering on them.  We may not be able to pound any sense into some of them, but they need to know there are enough of us to vote them out.

I find it interesting in the article how one author of the bill and the author of the article admit the proposed legislation validates our position on the government disarming us.

While I've still got a ton of letters to write for myself and others who need help, I'll likely write the author of the article and let him know how I feel about his views on "common sense gun control".  Basically that there isn't any such thing.  
 

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>