Hunting Forum

You are right TLC you are the master, you got me. You are the BB king. Now you want to push I can push right back, that is what I ment by a big spoon (sturing the pot hello).Yes I did answer the question you asked, No I have no problem with people running people off that paid for or had their memberships paid for just to come here and cause trouble and not for anthing else.
Next I know it bothers you that I use bad grammer so I will perposely do it now, It is sad when someone has to be so petty as to attack someones gramer, now that is really grasping at straws. Do you really think gramer changes how people take a post from someone here seriously.You live in your own little world.

So TLC go back and read the whole thread before you come after me .I did not start the crap .I said nothing insuting to him even RT came on and made simular comments .

And as far as fowlowing you over to EDH .It was RT and some of the otheres that ask me to come over there and that is why i did it .It was about a year after you started the sight before i came only after thier invitations to do so .I hope to god you never have a stroke or heart atack that cause you to have fisical problems like some of us .

And by the was there is a differance between being Hacked and a virus .

Being hacked is when they inter your computer and they take your info from your computer and unless they use it you will never know .

A virus is a worm put into your computer that will distroy your hard drive .I know as in 2003 we got hit with a virus ..And 300 later to replace it .

And as far as being abale to find the forum that the virus was on it is time consuming when you run a check on your computer it will pause on every time it finds where one is detected and then you punch the pause button and you can read where you where and time .It dose not tell you where it came from ..Need to do it more often as we found 90 on here .So when was the lsat tme you ran yours .Yes my security works prety good .

Holly does he run his site like this also. Spell ck, I will never use it now. This guy event though we have shown the proof of what was said and that he is wrong, he just will not admit he is wrong, What DB.

no, you did not answer all the questions.  just the one you wanted to.  answering the rest, would make you look foolish.

next, you did not answer my questions.

why is it OK for some members to attack folks, but not others?  no answer

why is it OK for some folks to run off members, but not others?  answered

why did you respond to a post to holly that I made?  no answer  seems you attacked(came after me)for no reason.  and you stated you do not do this.  "I dont respond negative to a person I don't likes post like you two do unles thew try to screw with me."  seems the truth escapes you at times?  no answer

as far as reading comprehension, not sure YOU have any room to talk.  maybe you should read and understand what was said by holly.

"And yes TLC I WILL ADMIT TO THE FACT THAT I DID GET RID OF SOME DIMWITS ON HERE.BUT I NEVER PUNCHED A BUTTON TO DO IT .AND AT THAT TIME THERE WHERE SEVERAL EDH MEMBERS THAT BACKED ME ON THAT ONE JUST LIKE THIS THANG ON HERE KNOW ."  now, what part of this do you not understand?  no answer or admission of being wrong.  big surprise and why does he say that other members backed him?  does that somehow make it OK to break the terms of use?  and guessing, the "normal" members will understand what he said.

biggest difference between us is, I am man enough to admit my mistakes.  you obviously can not.

"you are correct.  I gave holly credit for jackwagon when he said jackwipe.  not sure the difference between the two, but I was wrong."

ooopppsss bear, seems your lack of reading comprehension is spilling out, again.  seems one of us can admit when they are wrong.  and since it is in black and white, we all know who that is, now don't we?

as far as the grammar and being taken seriously.  did you miss the responses on this thread where people made comments about panmans age?  and since you are not new here, you might remember a young one that was here who was told repeatedly, to work on his spelling and grammar if he wanted to be taken seriously.  can't remember the young mans name.  but, guess there is a difference between that issue and this one?

yup, difference is every other word was spelt wrong. and yes I did answer you questions, read what I said and what holly said, (THOSE THAT PAID OR HAD THEIR MEMBERSHIPS PAID FOR THEM TO COME ON HERE AND CAUSE TROUBLE, NOTHING ELSE), god who is the one that doesent understand.
next holly and I were already in this topic when you chimed in and started with him, I mearly pointed out the fact that pan man stated with him after he gave advice. You dont like the fact that I am sticking up for him as I would do for any of the other guys in this thread if you had started with them, but you chose holly so now you target me because of it. I answered you questions, anyone reading can see I answered them. You just wont admit that you are wrong,JA

holly, my security set up runs 24/7.  and the sites runs the same.  and you were told on the zeta board what the issue probably was.  but you ignored it or didn't understand.

as far as the definitions of hackers, spammers, etc.  they are all the same.  they break into your computer, and do the bad stuff.  steal info, implant bugs and viruses, etc.

as far as jack wagon and jack wipe, just showes you didnt read and misquoted someone. It really does not matter what the difference is,now you just want to be petty, just because you have to be right and look like the big man on campus. The only reason you even chimed in on this topic was to go after holly.

there you go again.  you don't know me, but yet, you say why I chimed in.  got the crystal ball going again?  or just more of your contradictory bullshit?

and are you ever going to answer all the questions?  or are you afraid it will make you look foolish to do so?  you accused me, wrongly, of not admitting when I was wrong.  but yet, when proven when you were wrong, no admission.  truly pathetic.  and childish on your part.  one last time for the questions.  either man up, or shut up.

why is it OK for some members to attack folks, but not others?  no answer

why is it OK for some folks to run off members, but not others?  answered

why did you respond to a post to holly that I made?  no answer  seems you attacked(came after me)for no reason.  and you stated you do not do this.  "I dont respond negative to a person I don't likes post like you two do unles thew try to screw with me."  seems the truth escapes you at times?  no answer

as far as reading comprehension, not sure YOU have any room to talk.  maybe you should read and understand what was said by holly.

"And yes TLC I WILL ADMIT TO THE FACT THAT I DID GET RID OF SOME DIMWITS ON HERE.BUT I NEVER PUNCHED A BUTTON TO DO IT .AND AT THAT TIME THERE WHERE SEVERAL EDH MEMBERS THAT BACKED ME ON THAT ONE JUST LIKE THIS THANG ON HERE KNOW ."  now, what part of this do you not understand?  no answer or admission of being wrong.  big surprise and why does he say that other members backed him?  does that somehow make it OK to break the terms of use?  and guessing, the "normal" members will understand what he said.

what excuse are you going to use now to not answer?  going with the same one, that you did???  when all the normal members, as you call them, can see you haven't.

OK again you are right, I never answered your questions and you didn't chime in, Oh my I guess sence you never chimed in that we really arn't having this conversation. Are you for reall with the crystal ball remak on that one. OK AM sence you never chimed in so this conversation isnt really happen because your not posting to this because you never chimmed in you wont mind that I say shut the hell up than will you.

TLC i see no mention from you as to what i put up and did not answer my question .Did he not go off on me first .I believe he did .Did you not read the posts as in order as to how it got started .Why no coments on that .

You say it is not my place to run people off of sights as you do the same on your sight .Sense ive been on thier i will be the second one ran off .

Ijust made a statement to the fact that this comes up all the time .

SO NOW DID YOU LOOK AT THE QUOTES I PUT UP THAT STARTED WITH GOING AFTER ME .Probly not .

So let me get this straight because I'm as puzzled as hunter1!  TLC is just a member here that also has another website he runs where he can tell anybody to kiss of if he doesn't like them. Now he is back on this site basically doing the same thing here and telling you guys what you should and should not do, but you can't do that to anybody else?  Is this guy for real or what because with all the lengthy BS posts he puts up and says he has proven or disproven something, it doesn't look like he knows what the fock he actually said

Oh loring I aplaud you, get ready though because you will be with holly and I in his crosshairs now lol.

Not to worry! If he can't shoot any better than he can come on here and try to be whatever he's trying to be, we don't have much to worry about

Yup, I agree, But accordingto him I am the one that isnt answereing questions. This guy makes me laugh.

tlc,

not sure i get this 1!


"Patrick, you're right. when I read that post, it was in the number 4 slot. didn't pay attention to the page number. hate the way this thing moves when you make posts. goes backwards."

already covered the BS you are posting. stop trying to pad your post count TG2.







www.everyday-hunter.com, LM NAHC, LM BuckMasters, Bears, Bucks, and Buffalo, ah yes, the good life"


is this meant for me? tg2? padding my post count? cause i dont care about post counts!

Ok guys I want to thank all of you for your suport .But dont get drug in by him as he has been suspended from this and that is the reason he started his own .


And crippledhunter you can go into your acount and set it and it will take you to the last post you read .Bear03 and others told me how to do it .It is in your personal setting and you can set howmany post per page so it dose not post to fast if you have not already done this

Just thanks guys .

let's see, we'll start with ch.  that post was in reply to hollys' 4 posts that he made AFTER i admitted i was wrong and where I screwed up.  of course, the always intelligent bear accuses me of not admitting I was wrong. 


holly, go to you next.  you never asked a question.  you made statements.  at least, I think they were statements.  who the hell knows with the way you type.  I know, I know, you've had heart attacks and whatever.  so have a lot of folks.  deal with it.  ok holly, now you get to answer a question.  who did I run off the edh site?  and don't be afraid, you can name the name(s).  no one has ever been run off by me, no one has ever been deleted, or been banned.  those were the rules that were set when the site was started.  and one more thing you clueless fool.  that site was started due to the fact that the members here were tired of posts being deleted, threads being deleted, members banned for NO reason(QM), and the lack of respect this place shows it's members.  now, dispute that and I will make a fool out of you with the posts that other members made about this place.  including some current members.  and one last bit of information that you are clueless about.  I was not banned at the time I started the other site.  the banning was in the fall of the previous year.  and the banning came about because I called TG out for sending out emails saying when my house burnt down, I started the fire.  and holly, when did you get run off the edh site?  or are you saying you aren't coming back?  again.  hey, if you're to thin skinned and weak minded for that board, then don't come back.  but don't you say you were run off that board.

loring bennett, whoever the hell that is.  since you want to jump in, maybe you should stop taking reading comprehension classes from bear.  the other members came on here and made their comments to panman.  I then asked holly the following,

"so, you going after them ran off members?  and some dropped out from the club because of what you said?  can you explain how that is a good thing?  while you are at it, explain why panman can not state his views without people chastising him for it?  he is not happy with what he received, so why is that anyone else's problem?  seems people can run around telling him he should be happy with what he got, but he can't be disappointed.  strange."

now, LB, can you explain how I am telling anyone anything as that is what you said i did.  looks to me like I am doing nothing more than asking questions.

then, for some reason, bear decided to jump in, like you have, even though HE stated he does not do this.

" I am nothing like you two, I dont respond negative to a person I don't likes post like you two do unles thew try to screw with me."

now, this proves that bear is full of shit.  of course, he won't admit this.  I never said a word to bear, yet he came after me.  but, that is OK I guess.  whatever.  now, you want to do the same thing?  go for it.  can handle the three of you with no problems.  now, will respond to some of your stuff,

yes, started another site, and gave the reasons above.  in addition to those things, the members do not have to be politically correct.  doubt this?  ask RT if he can say here what he says there.  unfortunately, you have your next statement backwards.  these folks tell others what they can and can't do, but I was called out for doing the same thing.  if you could read, and follow the chronological order of the thread, you will see this is true.  whether you like it or not.  and I guess I owe you an apology for making my posts more intellectual than you can understand.  from now on, will try to make them more like bears and hollys since they are so clearly written.  guessing they may be more on your intelligence level.

bear, what can be said.  still no answers, just lame attempts to ignore.  and not that you answer questions, for obvious reasons, but here is one more.  where did I state that I did not chime in?  could care less what a weak minded, simple person says to me.  you clearly can't handle yourself in a debate.  especially when proven wrong.  but, whatever.  and bear, in your gonad worship of LB, you make the comment about answering questions.  where did LB asked me any questions?  or is this just another example of your reading comprehension skills?  but it is funny how you folks want to team up on someone.  maybe if you try hard enough, you can get more folks to join you.  makes it more fun for me.  and bear, one last thing.  you made the comment that you were going to use poor grammar, and spell things wrong on purpose(paraphrasing, not exact quote).  can you explain how anyone will know the difference between before and after the comment?

if I missed anything, let me know.

LOL, really. You have to be kidding, I did answer you question you fool several times. Next you you didnt answer my question why you set your crosshairs on holly, and yes you chimed in and went right after him, no one else, him spacifically. You mental midget he and I said to answer you question again, no I have no problem with anyone running members off that pay for or have their membership paid for, for the reason of comming here just to cause trouble, not to participate in hunting discussions(THE ANTI'S). Did I really have to word it that little bit for you to understand, Question asked and again question answered.
As far as holly he suggested that panman read through some of the other threads on the same topic, nothing more nothing less, He came back and started on his attack and throwing insults, you targeted holly for no reason and that is why I said something for you, again question asked and question answered.
Now I use the quick reply, NO SPELL CK you morone, you seem to know everything why dont you know that. You think your perfect,yah right. I type fast and yes I mispell and don't use proper puntuation, but it is not like you try to make it. You poking at me about it is your attempt to make me look stupid when in fact you are to people reading. You had to give a smart ass reply to a new member that asked a question, he only asked if you were a webby, then you start insulting anouther new member because he read the thread and thinks your a douch also. Go fiqure. Now I have answered your questions and responded to your insults, You can try to get me going, and This is going to be good, but I WILL NO LONGER REPLY TO YOUR POST HERE, AGAIN YOUR POST HERE.
You know hay holly this is all going on, and the one that it is all over hasent even come back to defend his actions. That's ok tlc just took his place I guess.

Bear03 got your PM and the other .

Know i have aquestion TLC remember Bunnyhunter on tour sight .HOW COME HE IS NOLONGER ON YOUR SIGHT .

holly bunny hunter was or is top gun, and not to worry tlc and i have had issues in the past!

tlc you say all your doing is asking questions? then why did you get so upset when all i did was ask questions on you edh site? i found something hard to believe and i asked questions, you sure didn`t respond well then! i wasn`t "screwing with you" just asking questions! just like now! if your going to be something be consistant!

but you still have not answered my question! top gun 2? me? padding my post count? me? not hardly! you and top gun did mean things to each other, so no i would not take your side, i took no side! i did apologise to your wife for what you said he said! but thats all i can do! IMHO it is YOUR JOB to defend your wifes honor! and as moderator again it falls on you not me to deal with a problem! just my opinion!