Good thing they are civilized up there and don't want guns

7 people stabbed in random attack in Vancouver

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...1-17-31-12

Time to order "Knife-Free Zone" signs up there in Vancouver.

Yup, better start pursuing a knife control agenda.

That is how we got butter knifes.

I'm all for plastic knives. Maybe KH knows someone to bring it up to their elected officials.
You all know that all this banning works. Just don't want to admit it. Just look at Chicago.

Yh when are they going to have knife free zones up there .Oh wait just ban sharp knives .

Another case for banning assault weapons. (ie. assault knives)

Yes- Canada (and our 600 homicides per year) are no where near as civilized as the U. S.(and your 15,000 homicides per year).
Thanks for pointing this out.

Good thing you're civilized down there and want guns...

GUNMAN KILLS 20 SCHOOLCHILDREN IN CONNECTICUT

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/n...d=all&_r=0

British banned the carrying of knifes. And with 311 million fire arms in the USA and sales going through the roof with ammo going with it, how in the heck can you control it? Say all you want, most of these weapons will go to ground if the ban passes. Then only the crooks will have them. Lawful people will be at their mercy in this drug war we are having. And for a little info an AR was not used in that school shooting just pistols. PS YH how did the hells angels get guns and bombs up there?

I would imagine that just as the liberal media in the States love to publicize every murder committed with a gun, likewise the Canadian liberal media would prefer to follow the Government's lead and downplay gun violence in an effort to support the current gun restrictions.

We have a few more people than you and laws that no one wants to enforce, doesn't have anything thing to do with civility. Whether they are shooting for that unattainable liberal utopia or control of the American people by taking guns, they are gunning for the impossible.

Buy the way it is said that 90% of the killings are minorities on minorities regardless of collar .So that just keeps that portion of the population down .

Thanks for pointing this out.

Canada has 10% of our population so their murder rate is about 40% of ours. ... Wow.

Thats what I was thinking CH. I guess it is not in the realm of common sense for a liberal to figure out that actually Canada's death rate by guns is most likely higher then the USA's because we have so many more people then they do. I am real curious to how the percentages work out then. LOL Of course our resident canucklehead would NOT believe it anyway. You would think they would have enough trouble up there in the land of no fun that he would have all the worries in the world without having to worry about us down here in the good ol USA. go figure.

Posted By YH on 05 Feb 2013 04:42 AM
Yes- Canada (and our 600 homicides per year) are no where near as civilized as the U. S.(and your 15,000 homicides per year).
Thanks for pointing this out.

We also have 10 times Canada's population not including the illegals!

There are approximately 7.4 million guns in Canada and 222 Million in the US.

So Canada has a higher percentage of murders per guns as does the US!!!!

There are other numbers that suggest there are 310 million guns in the US and just under 10 million in Canada.

Using those same figures, again shows less murders per number of firearms in the US compared to Canada!

We own 30X more firearms that Canada and have less murders per gun!!!

Population is going up and the murder rate is going down... What does that mean?

MORE GUNS = LESS CRIME!!!

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

Guys, don't forget that them canuadianscks are in the metric system. Therefore all their calculations and numbers work correctly in their books. And we'll always be guilty because we did not bow down to HM.

Boys-

Why is it so difficult for you to think/ research before you post?
Canada's homicide rate was 1.6/ 100,000 in 2011. Yours was 4.8/ 100,000. Canada's homicide rate by firearm is 0.51/ 100,000, while yours is 2.97/ 100,000.
I guess it is not in the realm of common sense for a Conservative to figure out that means you are three times as likely to be murdered in the good old USA, and six times more likely to be gunned down.
That said, please- don't let the facts stand in your way...

Explain what's wrong with the facts I provided?

I don't disagree we have a murder problem in this country... and it's going to get  a lot worse if firearms are banned.

There is more to the problem than firearms and statistics... the break down of society and family values has set a chain of events that is becoming catastrophic.

Banning the means to protect oneself, will only add fuel to this fire storm of destruction in society.

Washington DC and Chicago are cesspools of laws gone wrong... they have the strickteist fire arm laws in the nation and the highest murder rates in the country!

Those statistics speak volumes against disarming those that are NOT criminals.

YH, what percentage of Canadian citizens is white or Native Indian compared to black and other nationalities? When considering gun homicides in the US, there is one very large and glaring fact. Most gun crimes are committed by non-whites and the overwhelming majority of those crimes are committed in major population centers where the non-white residents make up the majority of the population. I'd be willing to bet that if the gun crime numbers from cities like NY, Chicago, D.C., Detroit, and LA were discounted, not too mention smaller metropolitan areas such as Cleveland, Philadelphia, Boston, Atlanta, and Miami, we'd see a number far less than Canada's!!! Regardless of how any organization wants to portray the numbers, the fact that black on black crime, followed by gang crimes are the two largest contributing factors to the homicide rate in this country; whether guns are used or not! That is indisputable, so your analogy fails to be a true comparative one.

Every country that has banned guns has had a rise in deaths by many different methods and this will continue to happen because when a person decidse they are gonna kill they will find a way to accompish the act.

Canada is a strange country.They believe if they can control our laws, than they would have a monopoly on us....What else would you expect from them wannabe frogs.If people are from california to qoute Holly "The land of the fruits and nuts" Then does that mean that the people from canada are frostied flakes?....lmao 

mw-
Into the hooch again?

   Thank you so much YH. You did what I thought you would...You see last night, I was trying to get a few of my friends to join the club. I told them I had friends, their was some characters,a few liberals, alot of conservatives, a couple canadians, and a side kick.....When I told them, I could get  someone to responed to me , "They said no way!"So I bet them 20 bucks(us)That I could.Low and behold....I stirred the pot and got you to respone.Thanx so much....now I can go down to the store and by more "hooch"....Im thinking that this might turn lucrative...seeing how your so predictable....As another note..I didnt mean the comment, but I had to get a response from you.  I really enjoy your comments. Keep up the good work bro.Im hoping to have enough cash to by another weapon by the end of the month!

MW may you should have bet $20 per person who responded to ya.

Dang, this thread has taken a bit of an odd twist


That said, YH, I don't doubt that your #'s are true, but in many ways they are deceptive in relation to the true nature of gun violence in America.

NAHH..Mr. CKELL..It was a gimme...I like the way I did it...and it gets better from here on out.I respect everything you say...just give me mine for a short bit ...lol

Glad I could be of service. Now send me half your take...

Yh..I would be glad to send you have of the take....If you actually did half of the work.I dont know for sure but im guessing your a zombie.at this point, you know getting a littlle for nothing..why should you be able to gat anything of me/ Your a good person...but I dont pay taxes to anybody outside the states.As a good note we could make a littlle cash......but I doubt it....lol...Have a good year..and I hope to make more cash of of you shortly. ( pretty good for someone thats always drunk, wouldnt you say)....lol..have a good night mr. YH

Ah but he did " work " by responding thereby allowing you to win the bet so under that guise he should get his half.

Testify...

MW I was wondering if you were tring to draw yh out wasn't sure the reason., you did a good job I do give you that. I was just suggesting that you should have bet them $20 per response your comment got after you drew yh out. And yh did do his part in making in making it happen, that would have been more you could/ should have split with him.

Would've snidely helped cover the losses? Nope, put up or shutup type of situation, bets aren't a spread the wealth propositions unless you got a stake in it. Maybe throw something sparkly out there MW, works for the obama zombies lol

Cam, you ol' "frosted flake"  how ya'll doin'..ya got to admit that there was funny don't matter who ya are

Gun control is a myth everywhere. YH you didn't respond to my message on the 5th. Google the hells angels in Canada. And please explain how the heck they had guns, bombs and a rocket launcher. Even their rivals had guns. Crime will ALWAYS be armed. The only way I see any slow down on gun crimes is better mental health and locking violent criminals for a very long time.

TT-
Same old, same old. You?
mowgle-
What message? BTW- I don't disagree with more money for better mental health services, and longer sentences for chitrats. The problem is, that means more taxes...

YH, you're probably right about more taxes. That is what floors me about Cal. new gun ban proposals. They now don't have the man power or money to collect the guns of convicted felons. How are they going to enforce all the added proposals. I guess they will use the yearly registration fees and wont have any problem going after the law abiding citizen.

YH It would not raise taxes in the USA IF this Gov. stopped wasting so much of our taxes.

Mowgle, that waste you speak of , part of that is all the pork no body, Rep or Dem really wants to get rid of. That pork helps keep both in office, votes by those they represent. They trade votes with each other for their verious pork projects, and the other laws and such, that is why there can not be a real budget. The Government paying for mental health issues, kind of a nother pork project. We have criminal laws on the books, if some one is a real threat to society to such a degree they should not be allowed to own a gun, should they not be locked away any way? No where in the Constitution does it say the Federal Goverment is responsible for any of our health care concerns or mental health concerns. Lawyers are the ones who help free those who committ crimes, on mental health issues, and prevent them from be placed where they can do no harm. We can not lock up every crazy person, just for being crazy, but once they commit a crime, crazy or not it still is a crime.

Posted By gopheer1 on 10 Feb 2013 09:02 PM
Would've snidely helped cover the losses? Nope, put up or shutup type of situation, bets aren't a spread the wealth propositions unless you got a stake in it. Maybe throw something sparkly out there MW, works for the obama zombies lol

Well there you go Gopheer eye, injecting that dastardly thing, reason into the equation, thus foiling snidely's plot to reep the reward without the risk. And to think I almost fell for it. Some times the hoof print water can cloud the judgement. 

Lol, a little reason goes a long ways, don't use it often enough myself. Now is it CK Hunnicutt and Trapper LD or visa versa?

I thought I was Clinger? But Hunnicutt or Trapper does sound better. LD does not get as emotional in his debates as I. Wasn't Hunnicutt the more emotional one between Hunnicutt an Trapper?

Posted By ckell on 11 Feb 2013 12:10 PM
I thought I was Clinger? But Hunnicutt or Trapper does sound better. LD does not get as emotional in his debates as I. Wasn't Hunnicutt the more emotional one between Hunnicutt an Trapper?

But thinking about it, maybe it is Col. LD,  More Potter than Blake. Even though he LD Potter is about as loony as we are he does ground us to some degree. And Jlowe Trapper or  RT Trapper. However Trapper was there at the start but then was gone much like JL is now.

Forgot about clinger lol

Well who are you going to hook up with Radar .

Hay there Radar O'Holly Joe.

Dambit you beat me to it lol

Posted By gopheer1 on 11 Feb 2013 07:43 PM
Dambit you beat me to it lol

Okay, I may get torched on this, but understand that I'm basing it on pure observation. If I were to relate RT4 to a M*A*S*H* character, I would relate it too emotional outbursts!!!

You guessed it... RT4 would be Hot Lips Hoolihan...

I'm thinking if you saw RT4 going off in a real life encounter he'd be spitting fire

So now we need to fill Winchester, Burns, and Blake

Winchester= YH... That was easy

Winchester= YH... That was easy

Snidely Winchester

I see Tom in Tenn more as Winchister. Snidely is at odds with us alot of the time, kind of like Col Flagg.

cKell well let me see. DHS no limit on budget and no accountability, all of the studies like the sex life of a college student, billions going to our not so friendly people all over the world, billions for war that we jump started, ammo purchases by DHS. This country is spending itself into a major recession.millions on perks for our gov. It is flat time this Gov. started living with a budget. One could go on but you get the drift.