Well, that ain't right at all- and I'm not just talking about the opinions expressed.
Your title is "Not from an American's mouth", but the author is an American.

...yet, oddly enough, you weren't complaining when a guy you thought was Canadian voiced his opinion this time- think maybe that's because his opinion dovnicely with yours?

Not necessarily... only when they're right!

Posted By YH on 20 Jan 2013 01:10 PM
Well, that ain't right at all- and I'm not just talking about the opinions expressed.
Your title is "Not from an American's mouth", but the author is an American.

My apologies... and I had such high hopes from our neighbors to the North!

I'll take everything nice I said back!

Too late swnoel: azzholes will always be arrogant and will try to tell how to do your shoit. They should just mind their own problems first

tern-
Get bent.

Play nice...

Posted By ternera1 on 20 Jan 2013 06:24 PM
Too late swnoel: azzholes will always be arrogant and will try to tell how to do your shoit. They should just mind their own problems first

What can't stand what is said .

And of course he just had to show his colors. Act like a duck, walk like a duck, quack like one, and they are going to call you a duck. The truth might hurt sometimes, but it's still the truth.

Duck ?! Why he's a big ol Goose don't ya know ?????

Listen, noob-
This was a relatively benign topic before you showed up running your gate. If you don't have anything useful to contribute to the discussion, FO.
Nice spelling in your signature line, btw. Talk about "idiocracy"...

Now you done got the Goose honking and if you keep it up he will start with the hissin, and biting yourn azz !!!!!

Now you done got the Goose honking and if you keep it up he will start with the hissin, and biting yourn azz !!!!!

YH, did you ever stop to think that idiocracy was an intentional comment. Take liberal idiot voters and let them elect liberal democrats, and the resultant government is an idiocracy!

BTW, how are we supposed to know that the author is an American?  The publication is Canadian, and when the author's profile is clicked, all that is provided is a list of his articles.  I couldn't find a bio anywhere to tell me he isn't a Canuck.

What is up with all these double post lately ???

Thank you Mr. YH, I stand corrected. If misspelling something is bothering you, I'll make an effort to use a spell check(if I find one) next time. I sure don't want to insult a good subject that is only trying to protect the proper use of the language.
I'll move on to other threads that might have more uneducated and forgiving members.

Posted By rthomas4 on 22 Jan 2013 11:22 AM
  I couldn't find a bio anywhere to tell me he isn't a Canuck.

Just the fact that he makes sense, should tip you off he can't be Canadian.

Pay no mind to YH, Ternera spell it the way it sounds, I do and most of us understand what is being said. YH likes to point out such things, it makes him feel superior in everyway, to those of us ingorant, stupid people who can not spell, therefore our misspelled opinions are ignorant and stupid and meaning less.

"You" showed us you were not prejudist the first time around. Now you showed us you are stupid and voted for him. Hello Idiocracy!

"You" showed us you were not prejudice the first time around. Now you showed us you are stupid and voted for him. Hello Idiocy!

Okay, I'm not jumping on the "misspelling" bandwagon as I'm one of the worst speller's I know, but I'm not sure that idiocracy is the word YH was going after, even though according too my spiel chock it is spelled wrong as evidenced by my spiel chocks correction above. Also I can't find the word idiocracy in my "1966" American College Dictionary. But that doesn't mean much, as we all know that the word is common American slang these days, it may be in some of the newer dictionary's. It is also the title of a 2006 satirical science fiction movie. So too say that idiocracy is spelled wrong may in itself be idiocy...

As far as American slang goes I would liken the use of the word idiocracy to the use of the word irregardless, which means the same thing as regardless. Back in 1966 the use of the word irregardless was considered poor use of the term regardless, but not necessarily wrong as the word is listed in my dictionary.

Now lets discuss the word prejudice

Ain't that what we all fell about dat ting in ofice dat cals him ur pesident .

wait I DININT PELL DAT AL WRITE DID I.

As far as American slang goes I would liken the use of the word idiocracy to the use of the word irregardless, which means the same thing as regardless. Back in 1966 the use of the word irregardless was considered poor use of the term regardless, but not necessarily wrong as the word is listed in my dictionary.

LD it's word poker. I'll see you regardless and raise you an( ir).

LD- Good call. I have no problem with "idiocracy"- but I don't guess some of you see the irony in calling other people stupid, and using the term "prejudist" in the same sentence.
ckell- It isn't your spelling that makes you ignorant- it's your views. In another thread, where I believe I referred to you as stupid, I apologized. You didn't have the grace to accept it. That was the last one you'll get. You want to pick a fight? Have at 'er.

sw-
The problem with people like Caruba is EXACTLY what you say in your tag line- if you tell a lie often enough, people will believe it. His crap has all been disproven- any fact check site will show that- but, as long as the lie supports your political cause, and you KNOW most people won't check the facts, why not continue to tell it? The REAL truth of the matter is- most people don't want the truth. They want what they want to hear. (I like that... I believe that will be my new tag line.)

I suppose it's more appropriate to believe Obama and the liberal talking heads, than any source that might offer an opposing point of view.  To quote Jack Nicholson's line "You can't handle the truth"!

Posted By YH on 23 Jan 2013 06:12 AM
LD- Good call. I have no problem with "idiocracy"- but I don't guess some of you see the irony in calling other people stupid, and using the term "prejudist" in the same sentence.
ckell- It isn't your spelling that makes you ignorant- it's your views. In another thread, where I believe I referred to you as stupid, I apologized. You didn't have the grace to accept it. That was the last one you'll get. You want to pick a fight? Have at 'er.

Kukun, I remember you said good points, I do not remember an apology with the words I Apologize. If I did mess that, I apologize, nothing requiers the acceptance of an aoplogy, but it is proper acknowledge it. I may have messed a slightly cloaked one. Now you say you gave one, but that well be the last. I would hope there would be no need for another for the reason you gave that one, to which now that it has be pointed out I do Humbly accept. 

I do Humbley accept.

Whatcha talkin' bout Willis?

Posted By copperhead70 on 23 Jan 2013 12:39 PM

I do Humbley accept.

Whatcha talkin' bout Willis?

Sorry misspelled Humbly, I fixed it. Humbly Accept without Pride, Fame or Power. Without gloating, if the Apology is still on the table, it is accepted. 

If misspeeling pisses YH off, you guys will see noting butt typeaneese from me......

ck-
Still on the table, and I appreciate that. Sheathing my sword, now...
rt-
No; it's more appropriate to believe fact check sites. I believe nothing that comes out of any politician's mouth.

Posted By YH on 23 Jan 2013 06:28 AM
sw-
The problem with people like Caruba is EXACTLY what you say in your tag line- if you tell a lie often enough, people will believe it. His crap has all been disproven- any fact check site will show that- but, as long as the lie supports your political cause, and you KNOW most people won't check the facts, why not continue to tell it? The REAL truth of the matter is- most people don't want the truth. They want what they want to hear. (I like that... I believe that will be my new tag line.)

Can I assume you prefer to hear ,what you want to hear?

The truth... how do you find the truth?

The media in the US have been enamored with Obama and have refused to do their job of reporting the truth!

Instead... jumping to conclusions ,misrepresentations, distortions, and lies have been their chosen path!

Where do you go... who do you listen to?

Both parties are as corrupt as the other, only a nation of laws can survive... not gangs!

The Democrats are on a full out assault of everything and everyone that are against their beliefs and plans... they will take no prisoners!

They're willing to do and say anything to accomplish their goal... it's a shame the ones that use to do good, are as corrupt as those they're reporting on!

Use the fact check sites... snopes, factcheck.org, politifacts. Have a look at the information shared- clearly, despite what some would have you believe, these sites are actually digging for the truth- neither is especially friendly to the Obama Administration.

YH, interestingly enough, from the different times I've bothered to look at those sites, I've failed to see where Obama has been shown to be wrong. Conversely, I've also never seen a conservative shown to be correct! I'm not disputing your claim, just pointing out that I haven't personally seen where your claim is actually true. Especially snopes, if I remember correctly it was factcheck that provided the dirt on the husband and wife team that own snopes, several years ago.

I know that snopes has been proven wrong on several times on mining and land rights that Blamer and his liberal communist Marxists are doing .Even the Lawyer that is handling the lawsuit here in CA has made fools out of them on several acasions .