Ben Shapiro to Piers Morgan: “You’re a bully. You’re standing on the graves of dead kids”




http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/b...dead-kids/

Good video. I am not sure, Shapio cleaned Morgans clock, or even put him his place. He did make a clear and concise statement. Well maybe not so concise becuase Morgan in typical liberal fasion would not settle for concise. And in typical liberal fasion, showed his/their bullying tactics. Which Shapio quickly pointed out and handed back to him. It was the liberals who jumped on the sandy hook tragity. Now they may have feelings for those killed, but they did not hesitate for a minute, before the bodies were cold to start, anti-gun rhetoric. Maybe even hopeing and counting on the Pro-gun side to hesitate, out of respect. Then as they spoke up, call them un-careing, unfeeling,for those poor victoms, then adding calling the pro-gun as being stupid and ignorant. Shapio did not allow that to destract him from making his point. He showed if they would atempt to be reasonable, without the name calling,attemped insults and not turn it into a name calling debate, there could be some reasonable discusion on the real subject and problems. The liberal do not hesitate to call names, hoping to turn a debate into not about facts, insults and name calling, they then say you are insulting me, when indeed they started it for that reason. And questioning their reasons for that, is then insulting.

"It was the liberals who jumped on the sandy hook tragity."

Sorry CK, but both sides jumped on this early on (The day of) That was pointed out in this very forum for those who were paying attention.

And lets face it, both sides have been all over this ever since.

"Sorry CK, but both sides jumped on this early on (The day of) That was pointed out in this very forum for those who were paying attention".

You are right LD, But was it not in defence of what the anti-gunners started and the pro-gunners knew the antis were going to do. The antis were on it before the bodies were cold, when is a good time to start defending ones self. When your enemy will not allow anyone to mourn the dead before they press their attack. Even useing the dead as an excuse to whip up an emotional frenzy to aid their attack, for their irrational cause and hate for an object.

Posted By ckell on 11 Jan 2013 10:25 PM
"Sorry CK, but both sides jumped on this early on (The day of) That was pointed out in this very forum for those who were paying attention".

You are right LD, But was it not in defence of what the anti-gunners started and the pro-gunners knew the antis were going to do. The antis were on it before the bodies were cold, when is a good time to start defending ones self. When your enemy will not allow anyone to mourn the dead before they press their attack. Even useing the dead as an excuse to whip up an emotional frenzy to aid their attack, for their irrational cause and hate for an object.

The NRA held off making any real comments for some time. The Pro-gunners knew it had to be the work of a somehow mentally unstable person. But the antis, didn't care or speculate on that. But they were on it speculating on what gun was used, how many rounds he had, why was he allowed to have so many rounds. Cries were going out for banning assult weapons, large cap mags, before any of the facts were actually known. My frist thoughts where OMG that is horrible, my heart went out to those parents and family, there was nothing I could do, but feel saddness. Then I knew the antis were going to start as they did, it had not fully sank in to me what had happened, before I herd the first of the anti-gun rheroric, as they speculated on what happened. Every pro-gunner knew, after they got their head around the fact so many kids were shoot and coming to grips with that, the antis where on it. 

Google search for the URL of The United Way, Sandy Hook fundraising page ( see instructions below, this is their directions once you have reached the page ) , and you will get a Google search result saying the page was created on December 11 2012. Take note of the dates !!!


PS: Might wanna visit here also: http://www.newswithviews.com/McClea...hip123.htm

This is your leaders stance on the issue... it hasn't changed.

The useful idiots in the MSM will do his job for him!

http://www.speroforum.com/a/16427/O...ois-Senate

Once again, an individual who supports our gun rights falls victim to using the incorrect terminology an failing to address the misinformation being fed the public by not correcting the term "assault weapon".

Also, I believe the responses that were first posted after Sandy Hook, were positively after the media began their harangue about the need for more gun control!