Just a Suggestion
Last Post 09 Sep 2012 04:02 PM by mountain_hunter. 9 Replies.
AddThis - Bookmarking and Sharing Button
Author Messages
okherpUser is Offline

okherp Send Private Message Posts:188
--
05 Jan 2011 05:29 PM

I really enjoy reading the "You Call the Shots" section, but they are a little one-sided. We only get to read one person's reason as why he would or would not shoot. Either of which would be perfectly valid. To be honest, I have disagreed with some of the shots, but that's just me. We all have differing opinions, and professionals are no different. What if, with each scenario, we read one person's "Yes" and another person's "No"?

Example:
Hunter 1: "I would shoot because..."
Hunter 2: "I would not shoot because..."

Richard Butler www.okherp.com "A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise." -Aldo Leopold. A Sand County Almanac. 1949.
evidrine2010User is Offline

evidrine2010 Send Private Message Posts:139
--
03 Feb 2011 11:29 AM
In my opinion, regardless of how many "yes" and "no" responses you get, you just cant replace being there. I find that a lot of people who respond tend to jump into that "this is what I would have done!" state of mind instead of really putting themselves in the other persons shoes. Its way too easy to just look at the facts and make judgement. I honestly think that the reallity of the matter is that most of us, being put in these situations, at these specific times, in these conditions with only a couple seconds to make a descidion, would have taken the shots also. Of course I do realize that the whole purpose of the "you call the shots" thread is to look at things after the fact and give an opinion of what should have been done differently, if anything. However, I don't care for reading comments made by others critisizing the descidions made that turned out well in the end. It tends to make a lot of people sound like they think they know better than everyone else.
okherpUser is Offline

okherp Send Private Message Posts:188
--
09 Mar 2011 06:03 AM
That's why I was suggesting that they make it part of the "You Call the Shots" with the pros doing it. I've read of the articles where Larry Weishuhn would take 300 yd shots at a quartering-to whitetail with only a 2-in gap to shoot through. I'm glad he's that confident, because I'm not!

I'm thinking that it would be nice to have other professionals' opinions on the same scenarios, to look at all the pros and cons of each scenario. As for me, once I get national and international recognition for my hunting achievements, then I'll put in my .02 about "Well I would have done this...". I would just like to hear other professionals' opinions, that's all!
Richard Butler www.okherp.com "A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise." -Aldo Leopold. A Sand County Almanac. 1949.
dhall8User is Offline

dhall8 Send Private Message Posts:69
--
09 Mar 2011 08:37 AM
i agree with you both of you . you both have valid points.
marxhunterUser is Offline

marxhunter Send Private Message Posts:69
--
09 Mar 2011 11:01 AM
I feel that any hunter's experience should dictate whether or not to take a shot. When I was 13, I went with my Dad deer hunting. A buck came running, chasing a doe and Dad stood up and shot the deer. He told me, that's how you do it. The next year, with his 30-30 I shot a buck running by my tree perch and hit him right thru the lungs. I've killed many deer since that first time, I'm 73 now. Most of the deer were moving or ruinning when I killed them. I'm talking about killing them with one shot. Most of my shots have been thru the heart or lung area, tending to be close to the backbone. I've never lost a deer that I shot. Growing up I learned to shoot with a B-B gun and it was strictly point and shoot. The sights on those red ryder bb guns were not accurate, so I never used them. I taught my son to point and shoot with air guns and he got very good at it.
mountain_hunterUser is Offline

mountain_hunter Send Private Message Posts:30
--
09 Sep 2012 04:02 PM
I think that is why they call it "You call the shot" I think they want you to think about it if you were there what would you have done. Kind of makes you want to think about it.
mountain_hunterUser is Offline

mountain_hunter Send Private Message Posts:30
--
09 Sep 2012 04:02 PM
I think that is why they call it "You call the shot" I think they want you to think about it if you were there what would you have done. Kind of makes you want to think about it.
mountain_hunterUser is Offline

mountain_hunter Send Private Message Posts:30
--
09 Sep 2012 04:02 PM
I think that is why they call it "You call the shot" I think they want you to think about it if you were there what would you have done. Kind of makes you want to think about it.
mountain_hunterUser is Offline

mountain_hunter Send Private Message Posts:30
--
09 Sep 2012 04:02 PM
I think that is why they call it "You call the shot" I think they want you to think about it if you were there what would you have done. Kind of makes you want to think about it.
mountain_hunterUser is Offline

mountain_hunter Send Private Message Posts:30
--
09 Sep 2012 04:02 PM
I think that is why they call it "You call the shot" I think they want you to think about it if you were there what would you have done. Kind of makes you want to think about it.


---