Hunting Blogs

Release Of Farm-Raised Deer Halted In Alabama

By: J.R. Absher

Dec 11

In response to concerns from hunters, conservation groups and wildlife professionals regarding the intentional release of captive-raised deer into the wild in Alabama, Conservation Commissioner N. Gunter Guy Jr. signed an emergency order prohibiting the practice, effective Friday, Dec. 7.

Guy’s action came after an independent group called The Big Buck Project announced plans to begin releasing farm-raised, genetically enhanced bucks in central Alabama’s Marengo County, claiming its intent was to “introduce trophy genetics” to the native white-tailed deer population.

The Big Buck Project is spearheaded by a Marengo County-based real estate group, Tutt Land Co., which specializes in selling hunting and recreational land and manages hunting leases.

At the current time, Alabama game laws do not specifically address the introduction of deer raised in captivity to areas outside enclosures. As a result, those behind The Big Buck Project were legally permitted to acquire deer raised in captivity that were selectively produced for traits such as large antlers.

However, the issue of genetic manipulation in whitetails to produce huge-antlered bucks for high-fence—and high-dollar—private hunting operations is easily one of the most controversial subjects in the hunting community today.

Earlier this year, the Georgia-based Quality Deer Management Association (QDMA), a 50,000-member non-profit organization dedicated to “ensuring a high-quality and sustainable future for deer and deer hunting,” stepped forward to adamantly oppose any expansion of the deer-breeding industry. The QDMA’s action marked the first time a hunter-oriented, conservation-minded national organization had taken a public stand on the controversial issue of deer farming in the U.S.

You can bet the folks at QDMA have been closely monitoring the situation in Alabama and were likely pleased with Commissioner Guy’s action last week.

“Our agency is responsible for the sustainability of the state’s wildlife resources,” Commissioner Guy said upon issuing his order on Friday. “Therefore, we are obligated to use caution before allowing such activity to occur.”

Commissioner Guy’s order will be reviewed by the Conservation Advisory Board when it meets Feb. 9, 2013.
 

7 comments

# TroutAngler
Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:49 PM
Excellent job! I don't think genetically enhanced critters need to be running around and mixing with the wild populations. It would be diferent if you were solving a birth defect or creating an immunity to some disease.
# dcarter11
Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:10 PM
The question that I have is what method of genetic enhancement are we talking about. Is it through selective breeding or actual gene manipulation. If it is just selective breeding we are talking about then I don't see why there would be a problem allowing these animal to mix with the wild deer population but if we are talking about actual gene manipulation then we have a potential problem if these animal are released in the wild. I don't think man should be fooling around with nature that way. Even selective breeding could be a potential problem if you get to crazy with it. Take Dogs for example. just about every breed of dog there is, is a direct result of selective breeding. I don't think we want to do this with deer. Could you imagine deer the size of chihuahua running around biting at your ankles and picking fights with other deer the size of a moose. I mean you have to be careful when your messing with nature. You can achieve antler mass increases as well as a general mass increase with providing the right nutrients to your food plots through out the year. Okay that's enough from me, its time for someone else to chime in and possible change my opinion on this matter.
# RAbear51
Thursday, December 13, 2012 5:31 AM
Excellant...a very BAD idea stopped dead in it's tracks. No surprize to see very rich real estate / development money behind this ludicrous idea. Money,Money,Money..Our natural resources and wild places cannot long survive when you start to see big money / special interest finances pushing their own little agendas, foe their own little goals. Hands off !!! Way to go Gov. and PLEASE PLEASE STAND YOUR GROUND !!!
# annika706
Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:18 PM
The already rich land companies that own so much ground that they pay hardly any property taxes will place large bucks so they can lure hunters to pay much more to lease their ground. These properties ought to be open to anyone to hunt. Ground that people have been hunting all of their lives is being bought up and posted. It is happening around my home. While the deer eat our crops along with neighboring farms, we can no longer hunt the woods that the deer stay in. Also, with all the genetic manipulation, how much do the "records" really mean?
# Corajayne
Friday, December 14, 2012 11:23 AM
Whether genetically manipulated or selectively manipulated that's just wrong. What we hunt is natural, in the wild. Otherwise 'wild game' will be just another product that some company produced for profit. I agree, the records will mean nothing. It's basically cheating.
# gator72
Saturday, December 15, 2012 10:41 AM
I agree with everyone's opinion on this subject!! Leave nature alone. dcarter11 had the best idea for larger bucks,it is the method we used at the hunting club I belonged to and helped establish in Mobile county Al.It only took 3 hunting seasons of good food plots,agreed upon number of "points"and number of bucks harvested each year to improve not only the "racks" but the weight and size of ALL of our bucks and does.The point is "feed and hunt intelligently" and the game animal will improve itself!!
# Tkachuk175
Monday, December 17, 2012 1:47 AM
If genetic manipulation means they are breeding selectively. Isn't that what most land managers do anyway? Watch any hunting show and they take those young buck that don't have the look that they want in their herd. Article doesn't answer that question. I wouldn't really have a problem if they are just releasing good gene, massive buck into a population. Rules of growth would still hold true. Unless the manipulation was so that the offspring would sprout 150+ in less than 2 yrs.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.