Hunting Blogs

Grizzly Country: Pepper Spray Or Gun?

By: J.R. Absher

Mar 07

The debate has raged for years, and it’s likely to continue unabated for many more: What’s the best line of defense for protection in grizzly bear country—a firearm or pepper spray deterrent?
 
Chances are very good that the regular readers of this blog, as experienced shooters and hunters, would overwhelmingly opt for carrying a firearm when the threat of dangerous game encounters loom. Conversely, many non-hunters and non-shooters might choose to carry pressurized canisters of commercially produced pepper spray when hiking or recreating in bear country.
 
Interestingly, the results of an extensive study conducted by biologists at Brigham Young University (BYU) in Utah, and published this week in the Journal of Wildlife Management, infer that both options are by and large the most appropriate choices for those involved.
 
BYU biologist and bear expert Tom S. Smith and his colleagues analyzed 269 incidents of close-quarter bear-human conflict in Alaska between 1883 and 2009 in which a firearm was involved. The data covered 269 incidents of bear-human conflicts involving 444 people and 357 bears, 300 of which were Alaskan brown bears.
 
The research concluded there was no significant statistical difference in the outcome of the encounters, which resulted in 151 human injuries and 172 bear fatalities.
 
“It really isn’t about the kind of gun you carry; it’s about how you carry yourself,” said Smith.
 
While the study highly recommended that backcountry travelers carry bear spray, it stressed that those opting for firearms should always consider their ability to be accurate under duress. Good advice.
 
“Guns are great, but for a gun to be great you have to be very, very good,” Smith added. “No one ever practices on a 500-pound animal charging at you through the brush at 10 yards. They practice on paper targets. That’s a big, big difference from being in the moment of stress.”
 
Data compiled in the study also revealed that handguns slightly outperformed long guns in halting a bear’s aggression, 84 percent of the time versus 76 percent.
 
“That’s surprising because some believe that handguns have no place in bear safety,” Smith said. “But they are much more maneuverable and carried more accessibly.”
 
What’s your choice in bear country?

6 comments

# wlohaus
Wednesday, March 07, 2012 5:30 PM
I'll take a 50 Cal. handgun any day.It should stop a bear, if not the noisce should frighten it away and if the wind is wrong you could gas yourself.
# npaul
Wednesday, March 07, 2012 6:20 PM
I’ve always thought that the pepper spray would just tick off the bear. I like having the option to kill the bear if I need to. I would also have to agree with the wind thing. I’ve never had the wind blow a bullet back in my face.
# TSTICE
Friday, March 09, 2012 12:01 AM
I choose to carry both my AK and pepperspray. The AK is roughly .30-30 equivalent in force and is portable stopping power. The pepper spray is because if the AK doesn't work, I don't want the bear to have a bland meal.

It is only being considerate.
# RAbear51
Thursday, March 15, 2012 6:37 AM
TSTICE...ROFL.. never thought about pre-seasoning that ole' bear's upcoming meal LOL ! seriously though..I suppose that pepper spray would be a "nice" thing to have in my pocket but it really seems to me that using it is kinda like wacking a wasp nest with a stick and standing there to see the results !! Tear gas..maybe.. but a power-packing,high velocity,knock your ass down side arm or rifle..OH Yeah you betcha !!!
# sreneau1
Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:54 AM
Wouldn't the bear tend to swat at an irritant. I think I would opt for a large caliber pistol, especially because they are more maneuverable at close range. When it comes to my life continuing being in jeopardy, 84% is HUGE compared to 76%. Yeah buddy!
# sreneau1
Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:55 AM
Sorry, that should have been a "?" after "irritant".

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.