Hunting Blogs

Hunters: Leave Minnesota’s Moose Alone?

By: Luke Hartle

Mar 02

Photo courtesy of carolynconner.

While Minnesota’s gray wolf population continues to grow like moustache hair on my aunt Marge, moose are continuing to produce a completely inverted population chart. According to the Minnesota DNR, moose numbers dropped to approximately 4,230 as determined by aerial counts done last month, down from an estimated 4,900 only a year ago. And the bigger picture is much more disheartening: The Minnesota moose population was an estimated 8,840 in 2006.

You don’t need to be the head cashier at Wal-Mart to figure out these moose need help.

With these declining stats comes the inevitable question, and one DNR officials and state biologists are looking at right now: Does Minnesota need to stop hunting these moose?

The deciding factor, again according to the Minnesota DNR, comes from “science-based triggers,” one of which involves the bull-to-cow ratio. If that ratio drops below 0.67 bulls per cow for 3 consecutive years, the season will likely close—and we’re dangerously close to that now. Although that ratio dipped to 0.64 bulls/cow in 2011, it jumped to 1.08 this year.

As it stands now, Minnesota is coordinating a once-in-a-lifetime bulls-only hunt, supplying 105 tags in 2011, which was less than half the number offered in 2010.

Got all those numbers straight?

It’s perfectly clear to me that hunting is not the driving force that’s causing the moose numbers to plummet (that, according to multiple studies, is being blamed on disease and parasites). Heck, wolves aren’t even getting the finger-point on this one.

Fact: Any moose done in by a hunter’s bullet is one that’s no longer going to dirty-dance with cows to enhance the population. It’s impossible to argue that point I’ve heard made all too often recently. But what this short-sighted view fails to illuminate is that with a nixed moose hunting season comes a big loss in study-funding revenue to help get these iconic critters back on track. With the end of moose hunting in Minnesota will come a decreased interest in the species—I promise you that—and this issue needs to be on the forefront of every conservation-minded person and organization, in our out of Minnesota’s borders. And, like the wolf issue exemplifies, once the hunting opportunity goes away it will be exponentially more difficult to get it back.

So, what’s the solution? Hell if I know. If you’ve got an idea, I’d love to hear it.

Keep your nose to the wind.

4 comments

# npaul
Friday, March 02, 2012 4:07 PM
I know that Washington State, Moose hunts are by special permit (a draw) and are a once in a life time thing.
What the DNR should look at is number of tags issued to number of successful hunters. I would have to imagine that not all the hunters that got a moose tag also got a moose. If the number of animals taken by hunters is low or acceptable then closing the season should not be an option. I would also suggest a few antlerless hunts to get the ratio back into spec.
The focus should be on the health of the heard. Look at finding some ways to curb the disease like providing habitat that promotes healthy animals.
It’s true that once you take away the hunting, it is way harder to get it back. Maybe a few limited seasons will be enough for the population to get back up.
# RAbear51
Friday, March 02, 2012 5:26 PM
If hunting isn't the cause of the declining population and disease/parasitism IS..seems like a no-brainer to me. When I used to live in Mich. we had the Bovine TB outbreak and certain measures were adopted to try to curtail the spread. Baiting/huge bait piles were eliminated,harvest numbers were increased in certain areas,deer were monitored and researched in myriad ways to try to slow the spread of this disease with fair success. Moose research monies should be earmarked for the discovery of ways to control and/or eliminate whatever is ailing the population. Brainworm is a common affliction to moose passed FROM deer. On Isle Royale early on this was a problem but changing habitat and other factors including wolves decreased the deer numbers over many decades and while it is still a problem it is not threatening the herd like it was when I was a young boy.I suspect that this is one of the factors affecting the moose in Minnesota. The blog didn't mention WHAT diseases and parasites are at work but it did cite that hunting and wolves were NOT the issue..SO..Minnesota get to work and figure it out and save your moose.
# RAbear51
Friday, March 02, 2012 5:28 PM
and yes, while the herd is in distress, limiting numbers harvested..like a lottery system hunt, makes sense for the short term. Give the herd a break while biologists try to figure this thing out
# TSTICE
Saturday, March 03, 2012 10:40 PM
Here in Alaska the DNR is trying to figure out why the moose population is dropping in the most populated part of our state: the Mat/Su Borough. One obvious reason is the last major forest fire in the area was in the 1980s. Regrowth of shrubery is the most beneficial browse for moose. They don't eat alfalfa or grass like deer can. Moose are almost strictly tree eaters. There was a population boom after those forest burn areas started growing back over the years. On Ak DNR's website it has an approximate regrowth scale of 5-15 years for the burn area to return to as before the burn and after that the animal densities/carrying capacity falls off.

What Minnesota needs to do is let their forest fires burn the trees and clear out the scrub brush to allow the natural cycle of regrowth to occur. The management techniques that seem to work best are when we use natural forces in the locations we need them.

A limited season on wolves wouldn't hurt anything either.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.