Hunting Blogs

Captive Deer Breeding A Prickly Issue

By: J.R. Absher

Feb 28

There’s an intensifying debate heating up among some in the hunting and wildlife management community over the practice of captive deer breeding in the United States, and if you haven’t heard about it in your state, chances are you soon will.

The business of breeding white-tailed deer primarily to obtain large and trophy-class animals for hunting purposes is perhaps entrenched most deeply in Texas, where high-fenced, pay-to-hunt private operations have thrived for decades. Similar ventures exist in other regions, to some degree, but not on the widespread scale that occurs in the Lone Star State.

This year, legislators in Georgia, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, N. Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia are considering measures that could significantly liberalize regulations regarding captive deer breeding in those states, and at least one national conservation organization has come out aggressively opposing such action.

The Georgia-based Quality Deer Management Association (QDMA), a 50,000-member, nonprofit organization dedicated to “ensuring a high-quality and sustainable future for deer and deer hunting,” stepped forward last week to adamantly oppose any expansion of the deer-breeding industry. The QDMA’s action marked the first time any hunter-oriented, conservation-minded national organization has taken a public stand on the controversial issue of deer farming in the country.

And that, in itself, is significant.

Also significant is the fact that a high percentage of QDMA’s leadership includes current or former professional game biologists with a background in agency work and in-the-field experience.

“There are no benefits for deer hunters in the growth of the captive deer-breeding industry—only risks,” Kip Adams, QDMA’s director of education and outreach and a certified wildlife biologist said in a Feb. 22 press release. “It is QDMA’s mission to protect the future of white-tailed deer and our hunting heritage, and we oppose anything that puts those at risk.”

QDMA estimates there are nearly 10,000 deer-breeding operations in North America that sell semen, artificially impregnated does, and live bucks to other breeders and “game preserve” operators to produce white-tailed bucks with enormous, often grotesque antlers.The organization also suggests that chronic wasting disease (CWD) likely arrived in several new states through transportation of live deer, either legally or illegally, and not through natural deer movements.

For the QDMA, there’s no middle ground on the issue of deer breeding for profit. It wants its expansion halted and the jurisdiction for existing facilities to be reassigned to state wildlife agencies.

“Some argue [captive deer-breeding] is an innocent endeavor with no negative impacts to wild deer or the everyday deer hunter. I emphatically and unapologetically disagree,” said QDMA CEO Brian Murphy. “Not only does this industry undermine the North American model of wildlife conservation in which wildlife is a public resource, it also threatens the health of wild deer and the public’s perception of hunting.”

Whatever you think about high-fence hunting and captive deer breeding, you have to admit QDMA has made a gutsy move to take a position on an extremely important issue—and one that should concern all sportsmen.

4 comments

# npaul
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:28 PM
There are several issues at hand. I do agree that the local state government should have the control of regulating deer-breeding operations in their respective states, but I can’t say that it all sounds bad.
I guess that I see it a little bit like a stocked fishing pond. There are parks that have a pond that is stocked with farmed fish every year so that you are practically guaranteed to catch something. I have fished one of these a day or two after it was stocked and the fish would come in schools to the bait like gold fish in a bowl.
If an outfit with a big chunk of land wanted to raise deer in order to “guaranty a kill” then I don’t know that I have a problem with that.
As long as there where measures taken to ensure that disease and such was controlled and not adversely effecting the local wildlife I think it would be a great thing. Especially in areas that don’t have a lot of public hunting land or national forest.
As with any issue like this, it will take a lot more analyzing and debating before a good solution can be reached.
# Lobes
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 5:12 PM
Farm raised deer should be controlled as with any other farm animal. If people want to hunt on deer farms and record their kills as trophys it should be recorded as such in an entirely different group of categories. Free ranging animals should still be listed under Boone & Crockett and Pope & Young as free range kills.

NBG
# RAbear51
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 7:22 AM
The captive deer breeding,IN MOST STATES, is very tightly controlled by the USDA and local DNR, with very much the same restrictions and guidelines as the livestock industry. In MI where I originally come from, this regulation is no joke. So the loose connection to the industry and CWD is just that..lacking any substantiation. I agree that "trophies" harvested on these "preserves" should not be classed/grouped w/free-ranging bucks in the P&Y or B&C record keeping.The concept as a whole doesn't seem to me to be problematic. Think about this..in future days (maybe not so far in the future) when hunting has become an elitist sport and the "common guy" no longer has access to land, guns, or ammunition to enjoy hunting,thanks to Govt. regulation over a sport that WE pay for and support,Including land acquisition through Pittman/Robertson funds, these "Preserves" will be the only place to hunt !!! Maybe huh ?
# TSTICE
Saturday, March 03, 2012 11:14 PM
I view farm-bred deer much as I view farm-raised salmon: something I do not want to eat.

That said, I would like to one day have my own herd of reindeer on my farm. Yes, it is a caribou just bred in captivity and heavily regulated by the AK DNR. Reindeer are not permitted to be released from captivity and are subject to the same health regulations as a beef, sheep, pig, etc. I view farm raised venison as a personal choice of sustenance not to be used for trophy breeding or to skew the numbers for those who hunt free ranging animals.

I agree with the other posters who do not want the farm animals counted in with Pope & Young or Boone & Crockett records. Farming animals has historically produced bigger animals/trophies because that is what the farmer is breeding them for. Natural events are not allowed to take their course i.e. the cull hunts for 'weak' bucks that many ranches offer remove more from the specific gene pool than predation would.

The only ranching for game that I truly appreciate is the African animals that have been thriving in the USA due to their importation before the idiotic ban on bringing your meat home. If you want to harvest one of these magnificent animals and fill your freezer with their succulent flesh you have to hunt them on a game preserve in the USA. Also include the fact that these preserves have been used by the many African nations to import new genetics back to the wild herds to stabilize and encourage herd growth and diversity.

That is a very good reason for game farms. For local wildlife in the USA? Keep them wild and make the hunter earn their meal.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.